Reactualizing Al-'Urf in Islamic Jurisprudence Reform: An Analytical Study of Its Intellectual Roots, Juridical Authority, and Applications in Islamic Economics

Authors

  • Mustori Mustori Institut Agama Islam Al-Ghurabaa Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/zr.v23i1.53185

Abstract

This study aims to examine the conceptual genealogy, legal authority, historical evolution, and application of al-ʿurf as a method for the renewal of Islamic law, with particular reference to Sharia economics. The research adopts a library research design employing a juridical-normative approach. Data are drawn from classical and contemporary literature on uṣūl al-fiqh, legal maxims, and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, alongside regulatory instruments and fatwas governing Sharia economic practices. These materials are subjected to descriptive-analytical analysis through a critical review of scholarly opinions and the evolving application of Islamic law. The findings confirm that al-ʿurf derives normative legitimacy from the Quran, Sunnah, consensus (ijmāʿ), and the established practice of scholarly ijtihād. Most major schools of Islamic jurisprudence recognize al-ʿurf as a valid legal proof, provided it satisfies the criteria of al-ʿurf al-ṣaḥīḥ and does not conflict with definitive textual rulings (naṣṣ qaṭʿī). Historically, al-ʿurf has functioned as a mechanism for legal adaptation since the prophetic era through to the formation of the authoritative schools of law. In contemporary practice, its application is evident in fatwas issued by the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council concerning modern economic instruments and transactions, including electronic money, non-cash gold trading, the bayʿ al-ʿurbūn contract, and digital commerce. It is concluded that al-ʿurf serves as a vital strategic instrument for legal renewal, enabling Islamic law to remain adaptive and responsive to new developments while remaining firmly anchored in the objectives of the Sharīʿah (maqāṣid al-sharīʿah).

References

‘An, Ibn. (1976). Majmu>‘ah Rasa>il Ibnu ‘Abidi>n: Nasyr al-‘Urf. Lahu>r: Suhail Aki>di>mi>.

‘Awad, S}alih}. Atsar al-‘Urf fi al-Tasyri>’ al-Isla>mi>. Kairo: Da>r al-Kita>b al-Ja>mi’i.

‘Azza>m, ‘Abd al-‘Azi>z Muh}ammad. (2005). Al-Qawa>’id al-Fiqhiyyah. Kairo: Da>r al-Hadits.

‘Ujailah, Mus}t}afa Abd al-Rah}i>m Abu>. (1896). al-‘Urf wa Atsaruh fi al-Tasyri>’ al-Isla>mi>. Libya: Da>r al-Kutub al-Wat}aniyyah.

Al-Asqala>ni>, Ah}mad ibn ‘Ali> ibn H{ajar. Fath al-Ba>ri> Syarh} S{ah}i>h} al-Bukhari>. Beirut: Da>r al-Ma’rifah.

Al-Barry, Zakariyya. (1975). Mas}a>dir al-Ahka>m al-Isla>miyyah. Kairo: Da>r al-Ittih{a>d al-‘Araby.

Al-Bukha>ri, Muh}ammad ibn Isma>’il. (1987) al-Ja>mi’ al-S}ah}i>h}. Beirut: Da>r ibn Katsi>r.

Al-But}iy, Muhammad Said Ramadhan. (1992). D{awa>bit} al-Maslahat fi al-Syari>’ah al-Isla>miyyah,. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah.

Al-Dimasyqi>, ‘Izz al-Di>n Abd al-‘Azi>z bin Abd al-Sala>m bin Abu al-Qa>sim. (1991). Qawa>‘id al-Ahka>m. Kairo: Maktab al-Kulliya>t al-Azhariyyah.

Al-Ghit}a>, As’ad Ka>syifu. (1415 H). al-‘Urf H}aqi>qatuh wa H{ujjiyyatuh.

Ali, Zainuddin. (2010). Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Al-Khatib, Ajaj. (1975). Us}u>l al-Hadits ‘Ulu>muha> wa Mus}t}ala>h}iha>. Damaskus: Da>r al-Fikr.

Al-Khayya>t}, ‘Abd Al-Azi>z. (1977). Nadzariyyah al-‘Urf. Oman: Maktabah al-Aqs}a>.

Al-Makki>, Muh}ammad Ya>sin ibn ‘Isa> al-Fa>da>ni>. (1996). al-Fawa>id al-Janiyyah H{a>syiyah al-Mawa>hib al-Saniyyah Syarh} al-Fara>id al-Bahiyyah fi> Naz}m al-Qawa>’id al-Fiqhiyyah,. Beirut: Da>r al-Basya>ir al-Isla>miyyah.

Al-Maqdisi, ‘Abd Alla>h Ibn Ahmad ibn Muh}ammad Ibn Qudda>mah. al-Mughni>. Beirut: Da>r al-Fikr.

Al-Marda>wi, ‘Alla> al-Di>n Abu al-H}asan ‘Ali> ibn Sulaima>n al-H{anbali>. al-Tah}bi>r Syarh} al-Tah}ri>r fi> Us}u>l al-Fiqh. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rusyd.

Al-Namlah, Abd al-Kari>m ibn ‘Ali> ibn Muh}ammad. al-Muhadzdzab fi> ‘Ilmi Us}u>l al-Fiqh al-Muqa>ran. Riyad: Maktabah Al-Rusyd.

Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. (2001). Fiqh al-Awlawiyyat: Dirasah Jadidah fi Dau' al-Qur'an wa al-Sunnah. Cairo: Maktabah Wahbah.

Al-Qi>si>, Marwa>n. (1982). Ma‘a>lim al-Huda> ila> Fahm al-Isla>m. Oman: al-Maktabah al-Isla>miyah.

Al-Qurt}ubi, Muh}ammad ibn Ah}mad ibn Abi> Bakr al-Ans}a>ri>. al-Ja>mi’ li Ah}ka>m al-Qur’a>n wa al-Mubayyin Lima> Tadhammanahu min al-Sunnah wa A>y al-Furqa>n. Kairo.

Al-Rahi>m, Mus}t}afa> Abd. (1986). al-‘Urf wa Atsaruh fi> al-Tasyri>’ al-Isla>mi. Libya: Da>r al-Kutub al-Wat}aniyyah.

Al-Suyu>t}i>,‘Abd al-Rah}ma>n. (1983). al-Asyba>h wa al-Naz}a>ir. Beirut: Da>r al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Sya>t}ibi>, Abu Ish}a>q Ibra>hi>m ibn Mu>sa> ibn Muh}ammad. (2003). al-Muwa>faqa>t. Riyadh: Da>r Ibn al-Qayyim.

Al-Syaiba>ni>, Muh}ammad ibn al-H{asan. (1953). al-Siyar al-Kabi>r. Kairo: Syirkah Musa>hamah, 1953.

Al-T{abari>, Muh}ammad ibn Jari>r. (1992). Tafsi>r al-T{abari>, Ja>mi’ al-Baya>n fi> Ta’wi>l al-Qur’a>n. Beirut: Da>r al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Tu>fi, Najm al-Di>n Abu> al-Rabi>’ Sulaima>n ibn ‘Abd al-Qawiy ibn al-Kari>m. (1993). al-Risalah fi Ri’a>yah al-Maslah}at. Kairo: Da>r al-Misriyah al-Lubnaniyah.

Al-Zarqa>, Mus}t}afa. (1968).> al-Madkhal ila> al-Fiqh al-‘A>mm. Beirut: Da>r al-Fikr.

Al-Zuh}aili>, Muh}ammad Mus}t}afa>. (2006). al-Waji>z fi> Us}u>l al-Fiqh al-Isla>mi>. Beirut: Da>r al-Khai>r.

Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah. (1986). Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr.

Amalia, Khikmatun. (2020). ‘Urf Sebagai Metode Penetapan Hukum Ekonomi Islam. as-Salam, 9 (1).

Andiko, Toha. (2011). Ilmu Qowa’id Fiqhiyyah Panduan Praktis dalam Memproses Problematika Hukum Islam Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Teras.

Ascarya. (2015). Akad dan Produk Bank Syariah. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London.

Ayub, M. (2007). Understanding Islamic Finance. John Wiley & Sons. Usmani, M. T. (2002). An Introduction to Islamic Finance. Kluwer Law International.

Badawi>, Sulaima>n ‘Abd al-Wahha>b al-Syah}h}a>t. (2021). al-‘Urf ‘Inda al-Us}u>liyyi>n wa Atsaruh fi> al-Furu>’ al-Fiqhiyyah. Majallah Kulliyyah al-Dira>sa>t al-Isla>miyyah Bani>n.

Badra>n, ‘Abd al-Qa>dir ibn Ah}mad ibn Mus}t}afa> ibn ‘Abd al-Rah}i>m ibn Muh}ammad. (1969). al-Madhkal ila> Madzhab al-Ima>m Ah}mad ibn H{anbal. Beirut: Da>r al-Fikr.

Badra>n, Badra>n Abu> al-‘Ainain. (1965). Us}u>l al-Fiqh. Kairo: Da>r al-Ma’a>rif.

Chaq, Moh. Dliya’ul. (2018). Telaah Ulang Teori ‘Urf: Mengurai Perdebatan Ulama Tentang Penggunaan ‘Urf dalam Mazhab. Tafaqquh: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Keislaman, 6 (1)).

Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI). Himpunan Fatwa DSN-MUI (berbagai edisi).

Dzajuli. (2010). Kaidah-kaidah Fiiqih. Jakrata: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Fauziah. (2014). Konsep ‘Urf Dalam Pandangan Ulama Ushul Fiqh, Telaah Historis. Jurnal Nurani, 14 (2).

Haeri Yazdi, M. (1994). The Principles of Epistemology in Islamic Philosophy: Knowledge by Presence. State University of New York Press

Hakim, Abdul. (2014). Kearifan Lokal dalam Ekonomi Islam: Studi atas Aplikasi al-‘Urf Sebagai Dasar Adopsi. Akademika, 8 (1).

Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyyah. (1991). I'lām al-Muwaqqi'īn 'an Rabb al-'Ālamīn. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.

Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. (2008). Shari'ah Law: An Introduction. Oneworld Publications.

Khalla>f, ‘Abd al-Waha>b. (1993). Mas}a>dir al-Tasyri>’ al-Isla>mi> Fi>ma> la> Nas}s} Fi>h. Damaskus: Da>r al-Qalam.

Khalla>f, ‘Abdul Wahab. (1996). Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Islam (Us}u>l al-Fiqh). Jakarta: PT. Raja GrafindoPersada.

Khallaf, A. W. (1978). 'Ilm Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Kuwait: Dār al-Qalam.

Lukito, Ratno. (2001). Iskamic Law and Adat Encounter: The Experience of Indonesia. Jakarta: Logos.

Manz}u>r, Jama>l al-Di>n Muh}ammad ibn Makram ibn. (1990). Lisa>n al-‘Arab. Beirut: Da>r al-Fikr.

Masse, Rahman Ambo. (2015). Fiqh Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah: Antara Realitas dan Kontekstual. Yogyakarta: TrustMedia Publishing.

Nada>da, Mus}t}afa Wada>. (2019). H{ujjiyah al-‘Urf ‘Inda al-Us}u>liyyi>n wa Atsaruh fi> al-Fiqh al-Isla>mi>,: Dira>sah Us}u>liyyah. Kairo: Tesis Universitas al-Jazi>rah.

Nafis, M. Cholol. (2011). Teori Hukum Ekonomi Syariah: Kajian Komprehensif tentang Teori Hukum Ekonomi Islam, Penerapannya dalam Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional dan Penyerapannya ke dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia. UI-Press.

Nujaym, Ibra>him ibn. (1980). al-Asyba>h wa al-Naz}a>ir. Beirut: Da>r al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Rivai, Veitzal. (2012). Keistimewaan Ekonomi Islam dalam Mempercepat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Umat. Journal Analytica Islamica, 1 (2).

Rizal, Fitra. (2019). Penerapan ‘Urf sebagai Metode dan Sumber Hukum Ekonomi Islam. al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 1 (1).

Roibin. (2010). Dimensi-dimensi Sosio-Antropologis Penetapan Hukum Islam dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Malang: UIN Malang Press.

Romli. (2014). ‘Illat dan Pengembangan Hukum Islam. Intizar.

Sa>nu>, Qut}ub Mus}tafa>. (2000). Mu’jam Mus}t}alah}a>t Us}u>l al-Fiqh. Damaskus: Da>r al-Fikr.

Sabiq, Sayyid. (1971). Fiqh al-Sunnah. Beirut: Daar al-Fikr.

Sarjana, Sunan Autad, dkk. (2017). Konsep ‘Urf dalam Penetapan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Tsaqafah. 13 (1).

Sodiqin, Ali . (2009). Dasar Teologis Integrasi Islam dan Budaya Lokal, dalam Ali Sodiqin, dkk., Islam & Budaya Lokal. Yogyakarta: Pusat Kajian Sejarah dan Budaya Islam (PKSBI) Jurusan SKI UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Sodiqin, Ali. (2008). Antropologi Al-Qur’an, Model Dialektika Wahyu dan Budaya. Yogyakarta: ar-Ruzz Media Group.

Sunnah, Ah}mad Fah}mi> Abu. (1947). al-‘Urf wa al-‘A>dah fi> Ra’yi al-Fuqaha>. Kairo: Mat}ba’ah al-Azhar.

Susiadi. AS. (2014). Akomodasi ‘Urf Terhadap Pemahaman Fiqih Indonesia Masa Lalu. Jurnal Asas.

Syalabi>, Muh}ammad Must}afa>. (2012). Us}u>l al-Fiqh al-Isla>mi>. Beirut: al-Da>r al-Ja>mi’iyyah.

Syarifuddin, Amir. (2012). Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group.

Published

2026-09-15

How to Cite

Reactualizing Al-’Urf in Islamic Jurisprudence Reform: An Analytical Study of Its Intellectual Roots, Juridical Authority, and Applications in Islamic Economics. (2026). Al-Zahra : Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/zr.v23i1.53185