Sexual Violence Management Through Polygraph and Psychological Intervention

Vikas S Minchekar

Abstract


Rape and violence against women are a massive problem in India. Among the various cities in India the highest number of rapes reported in metropolitan cities rather than small cities. Not only sexual offences are remarkably grown up in cities but in a rural area also. Rape victims in India, especially in a rural area often subject to shaming and considered not suitable for married life and the life of victim became destroyed. The study aimed to find a high degree of sexual violence among students and provide them with a systematic intervention to control their sexual motives. In the study, 500 students were surveyed and administered Sexual Violence Scale and 34 students were found with a high degree of sexual violence tendency. These students were randomly divided into two groups viz. experimental and control. The experimental group adults were provided a sex management programme for two months while the control group adults didn’t provide any programme. After a two months period, both groups were readministered Sexual Violence Risk Scale. The obtained data were analysed through t statistic. The significant difference was found between the two groups. It was found that the degree of sexual violence significantly decreased among experimental group adults.

 

 


Keywords


adult sex offenders; polygraph; psychological intervention; sexual violence

References


Agarwal, K. M., Satjia, D. C., Nathawat, S. S., & Gupta, O. P. (1987). Psychosocial profile of rapists. Indian Journal of Clinical and Psychology, 14, 102-107.

Ahlmeyer, S., Heil, P., McKee, B., & English, K. (2000). The impact of polygraph on admissions of victims and offences in adult sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment and Treatment, 12, 123-138.

Bourke, M. L., & Hernandez, A. E. (2009). The ‘Butner Study’ redux: A report of the incidence of hand son child victimization by child pornography offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 183-191.

Bourke, M. L., Fragomeli, L., Detar, P. J., Sullivan, M. A., Meyle, E. & O’Riordan, M. (2014). The use of tactical polygraph with sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(3), 354-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2014.886729

Buschman, J., Bogaerts, S., Foulger, S., Wilcox, D., Sosnowski, D., & Cushman, B. (2010). Sexual history disclosure polygraph examinations with cybercrime offences: A first Dutch explorative study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 395-411.

Barlow, H. D. (1987). Of secrets and visions: Stanley cohen on crime control. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78, 430-441.

Bickley, J., & Beech, A. (2001). Classifying child abusers: Its relevance to theory and clinical practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(1), 50-69.

Chockalingam, K., & Annie, V. (2008). Sexual harassment of women in public transport in Chennai City-a victimology perspective. The Indian Journal of Criminology and Criminalistics, 14(3), 167.

Consigli, J. E. (2002). Post-conviction sex offender testing and the American Polygraph Association. In M. Kleiner (Ed.). Academic Press.

Cortoni, F., & Gannon, T. A. (2016). Female sexual offenders: an overview. in: Phenix, a., hoberman, h. (eds) sexual offending. Springer.

Emerick, R. L., & Dutton, W. A. (1993). The effect of polygraph on the self-report of an adolescent sex offender: Implications for risk assessment. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 83-103.

English, K., Jones, L., Pasini-Hill, D., Patrick, D., & Sydney, C. T. (2000). The value of testing in sex offender management. Division of Criminal Justice, Office of Research and Statistics. Department of Public Safety. Research report submitted to the National Institute of Justice Denver Colorado.

English, K., Jones, L., Patrick, D. & Pasini-Hill, D. (2003). Sexual offender containment: Use of the postconviction polygraph. Annals of the New York Academic of Sciences, 989, 411-427.

English, K., Jones, L,. Diane, P. H,. Patric, D., & Sydney, C. T. (2003). The value of polygraph testing in sex offender management. Division of Criminal Justice, Office of Research and Statistics. Department

of Public Safety. Research report submitted to the National Institute of Justice Denver Colorado.

French, C. (2012). Polygraph is notoriously unreliable and easy to fool, and sooner or later sex offenders will.discover.the.truth.about.them..http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/aug/10/polygraphlie-detector-tests-sex-offerenders

Finkelhor, D. (1994). The international epidemiology of child sexual abuse. Child abuse & neglect, 18(5), 409-417.

Gannon, A. T., Beech, A. R., & Ward, T. (2008). Does the polygraph lead to better risk prediction for sexual offenders. Science Direct, Aggression & Violent Behaviour, 13, 29-44.

Grubin, D., Madsen, L., Parsons, S., Sosnowski, D., & Warberg, B.

(2004). A prospective study of the impact of polygraph on high-risk behaviours in adult sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of

Research and Treatment, 16(3), 209-222.

Gill, A., & Harrison, K. (2015). Child grooming and sexual exploitation: Are South Asian men the UK media’s new folk devils. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 4(2), 34-49.

Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–62.

Hall, G. C. N., & Hirschman, R. (1991). Toward a theory of sexual aggression: A quadripartite model. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 59(5), 662.

Jespersen, A.F., Lalumiere, M. L., & Seto, M. C. (2009). Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non-sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(3), 179-192.

Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. University of Minnesota Press.

Levenson, J., & Socia, K. (2015). Adverse childhood experiences and arrest patterns in a sample of sexual offenders. Journal of interpersonal violence, 31(10), 1-29.

Math, S. B., Viswanath, B., Maroky, A. S., Kumar, N. C., Cherian, A. V., & Nirmala, M. C. (2014). Sexual crime in India: Is it influenced by pornography. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 36(2),

-152.

Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). An integrated theory of the etiology of sexual offending. In Handbook of sexual assault. Springer.

Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them. Annu Rev Sex, 11(1), 26-91.

NCRB (National Crime Records Bureau). (2020, March 6). Ministry of home affairs. http://ncrb.nic.in/ciiprevious/main.htm

Pathare, R. (2013). Personality as a major cause of rape: A comparative study of four criminal group. Indian Streams Research Journal, 3(10), 2230-7850.

Patrick, D., Pasini-Hill, D., Jones, L., Sydney, C. T., & English, Kim. (2013). How is the post conviction polygraph examination used in adult sex offender management activities. Division of Criminal

Justice, Office of Research and Statistics. Department of Public Safety. Research report submitted to the National Institute of Justice Denver Colorado.

Suresh, B., Biju, V., Maroky, A. S., Kumar, N. C., Cheriyan, A.V., &

Christine, M. N. (2014). Sexual crime in India: Is it influenced by pornography. Indian J Psychol Med, 36(2), 147-152.

Vega, V., & Malamuth, N. M. (2007). Predicting sexual aggression. The role of pornography in the context of general and specific risk factors. Aggress Behav, 33(2). 104-117.

Ward, T., & Siegert, R. J. (2002). Toward a comprehensive theory of child sexual abuse: A theory knitting perspective. Psychology, crime and law, 8(4), 319-351.

Ward, T., & Beech, A. (2006). An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggression and violent behavior, 11(1), 44-63.

Wilcox, D. T., Foss, C. M., & Donathy, M. L. (2005). A case study of a male sex offender with zoo sexual interests and behaviours. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 305-307


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/tazkiya.v10i1.25803

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.