Program Keluarga Harapan and Senior Secondary Out-of-School Rates

Ilham Irawan Romadhoni, Riatu Mariatul Qibthiyyah

Abstract


Research Originality: The novelty of this study lies in its use of a combined approach of probit analysis and propensity score matching to evaluate the impact of the Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) on reducing out-of-school rates at the senior high school level, specifically before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Research Objectives: The study aims to empirically assess the effectiveness of PKH in enhancing educational outcomes to break the cycle of poverty.

Research Methods: The study also utilizes recent data from 2019 and 2022, reflecting the increased financial support of up to IDR 10 million per family per year. The analysis was conducted in two stages: first, on the overall sample of students from eastern Indonesia and other regions, and second, on a subsample of students in eastern Indonesia.

Empirical Results: The results indicate that PKH was more effective in 2022, with a 2.3% reduction in the overall sample and a 1.4% reduction in the eastern Indonesian subsample in preventing students from dropping out of school compared to 2019.

Implications: The study suggests that PKH can effectively support educational participation and reduce out-of-school rates, supplementing primary programs like PIP (Program Indonesia Pintar).

JEL Classification: I26, I38


Keywords


education; program keluarga harapan (PKH); out-of-school children rate; marginal effect; propensity score matching

References


Adelman, M., & Szekely, M. (2017). An Overview of School Dropout in Central America: Unresolved Issues and New Challenges for Education Progress. European Journal of Educational Research, 6, 235–259. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.235.

Alatas, V., Cahyadi, N., Ekasari, E. Y., Harmoun, S., Hidayat, B., Janz, E., Jellema, J., Tuhiman, H., & Wai-Poi, M. (2011). Program Keluarga Harapan: Main Findings from the Impact Evaluation of Indonesia’s Pilot Household Conditional Cash Transfer Program. World Bank Working Paper No. 72506.

Baird, S., Ferreira, F. H. G., Ozler, B., & Woolcock, M. (2013). Relative Effectiveness of Conditional and Unconditional Cash Transfers for Schooling Outcomes in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 1–124. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2013.8.

Cahyadi, N., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., Prima, R. A., Satriawan, E., & Syamsulhakim, E. (2020). Cumulative Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: Experimental Evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(4), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190245.

De Brauw, A., & Hoddinott, J. (2011). Must Conditional Cash Transfer Programs be Conditioned to be Effective? The Impact of Conditioning Transfers on School Enrollment in Mexico. Journal of Development Economics, 96(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.08.014.

de Hoop, J., & Rosati, F. (2013). Cash Transfers and Child Labour. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7496.

Del Granado, F., Fengler, W., Ragatz, A., & Yavuz, E. (2007). Investing in Indonesia’s Education: Allocation, Equity, and Efficiency of Public Expenditures. Policy Research Working Paper 4329, 1-43.

Edmonds, E. V., & Schady, N. (2012). Poverty Alleviation and Child Labor. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(4), 100–124. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.4.4.100.

Fiszbein, A., Schady, N., & Ferreira, F. H. G. (2009). Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. World Bank Policy Research Report.

Galiani, S., & McEwan, P. J. (2013). The Heterogeneous Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 103, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.04.004.

Glewwe, P., & Kassouf, L. (2012). The Impact of the Bolsa Escola/Familia Conditional Cash Transfer Program on Enrollment, Dropout Rates, and Grade Promotion in Brazil. Journal of Development Economics, 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.05.008.

Hartarto, R. B., & Wardani, D. T. K. (2023). Does Conditional Cash Transfer Change Educational Aspirations? Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Social Economics, 50(1), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-11-2021-0671.

Hidayatina, A., & Ozanne, A. (2019). Can Cash Transfers Mitigate Child Labor? Evidence from Indonesia’s Cash Transfer Program for Poor Students in Java. World Development Perspectives, 5, 100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2019.100129.

Hullsiek, K.H. & Louis, T.A. (2002). Propensity Score Modeling Strategies for the Causal Analysis of Observational Data. Northamptonshire: Oxford University Press.

Janvry, A., Finan, F., & Sadoulet, E. (2012). Local Electoral Incentives and Decentralized Program Performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(3), 672–685.

Lee, K., & Hwang, M. (2016). Conditional Cash Transfer Against Child Labor: Indonesia Program Keluarga Harapan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17, 391-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9436-7

Lindert, K., Linder, A., Hobbs, J., & de La Brière, B. (2007). The Nuts and Bolts of Brazil’s Bolsa Família Program: Implementing Conditional Cash Transfers in a Decentralized context. World Bank Report No. 39853.

Rawlings, L. B., & Rubio, G. M. (2005). Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs. The World Bank Research Observer, 20(1), 29–55.

Rosenbaum, P.R., & Rubin, D.B. (1983). The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.

Saavedra, J. E., & García, S. (2012). Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs on Educational Outcomes in Developing Countries: A Meta-analysis. RAND Working Paper.

Schultz, T. P. (2004). School Subsidies for the Poor: Evaluating the Mexican Progresa poverty program. Journal of Development Economics, 74(1), 199–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.12.009.

Stiglitz, J. E., & Rosengard, J. K. (2015). Economics of The Public Sector. Fourth Edition. New Jersey: W. W. Norton Company, Inc.

Suryadarma, D., Suryahadi, A., & Sumarto, S. (2006). Causes of Low Secondary School Enrollment in Indonesia. SMERU Research Institute, 1–41.

Takahashi, K. (2011). Determinants of Indonesian Rural Secondary School Enrolment: Gender, Neighborhood and School Characteristics. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 47(3), 395–413.

Wasim, B., Karthick, M. P., Sulastri, A. S., & Kumar, T. V. S. R. (2019). Report on findings of impact evaluation of Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH). Microsave Working Paper. https://www.microsave.net/2019/07/26/report-on-findings-of-impact-evaluation-of-program-keluarga-harapan-pkh/

World Bank. (2011). PKH: Main Findings from the Impact Evaluation of Indonesia’s Pilot Household Conditional Cash Transfer Program. Jakarta. World Bank Report.

Yulianti, N. R. (2015). The Functioning and Effect of a Cash Transfer Program in Indonesia. (Unpublished Thesis). Erasmus University Rotterdam.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/sjie.v13i1.39891

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.