Uji Validitas Konstruk Organizational Climate Measure Versi Indonesia Dengan Metode Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

Authors

  • Nia Tresniasari UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v4i3.9299

Keywords:

Uji Validitas Konstruk, Iklim Organisasi, Analisis Faktor Konfirmatorik

Abstract

Abstract

In the development of Industrial and Organizational psychology organizational climate variable is often used as predictor, thus valid measurement tools is really needed. Many organizational climate scales have been developed. Organizational climate measurement measures 17 aspects which are categorized into 4 quadrant. Previously, Malcolm G. Patterson, et. al. (2005) has tested this instrument validity with worker based in England as participants. This study tested validity of this instrument with 176 respondent. To test the construct, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) method  is used, using MPLUS 7.1. The result of this study showed that items is multidimensional and some of them measure each scales significantly.

 

Abstrak

Pada perkembangan ilmu psikologi industri dan organisasi, variabel iklim organisasi seringkali dijadikan sebagai prediktor, sehingga alat ukur yang valid sangat diperlukan. Skala iklim organisasi sudah banyak dikembangkan. Organizatinal climate measure mengukur 17 aspek yang dikelompokan menjadi 4 kuadran. Sebelumnya, Malcolm G. Patterson, dkk (2005) telah menguji validitas alat ini dengan partisipan pegawai yang berada di Inggris.  Pada penelitian ini, peneliti menguji validitas alat ini dengan partisipan sebanyak 176 orang. Untuk menguji konstruk ini digunakan metode analisis confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) dengan bantuan program perangkat lunak MPLUS 7.1. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan item bersifat multidimensional dan beberapa mengukur masing-masing skala dengan signifikan.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Diener, E. (2005). Guidelines for National indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Positive Psychology Center. University of Pennsylvania.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95 (3), 542-575.

Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49 (1), 203-235.

Litwin, G.L., & Stringer, R (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Patterson, MG., West, M.A., Shackleton V.J., Dawson J.F., Lawthom R., Maitlis S., Robinson, D.L., and Wallace, A.M., (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity, and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 26, 379-408.

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicator Research Series, 39 (1). doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_5.

Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36, 19–39.

Umar, J. (2011). Confirmatory factor analysis: Bahan Ajar Perkuliahan. Fakultas psikologi UIN Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Uji Validitas Konstruk Organizational Climate Measure Versi Indonesia Dengan Metode Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). (2018). JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia), 4(3). https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v4i3.9299