Non-Performing Finance in Sharia Financial Institutions in Indonesia: A Case Study Of BPRS Adeco (Aceh Development Corporate)
Abstract
High level of Non-Performing Finance (NPF) has become one of risks facing intermediary financial institutions including Islamic banks. Indonesia’s Financial Authority found that NPF ratio of Islamic banks is relatively higher (4,12%) that the one of conventional banks (2,96%) (OJK 2017). Literature indicate the influence of bank’s internal and external factors on high NPF. This study aims to analyze the factors that influence the high level of NPF and its settlement and strategies to reduce the level of NPF in Sharia Rural Banking (BPRS/Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Syariah). Taking BPRS Adeco (Aceh Development Corporate) in Langsa City District, Aceh, as a case study, this research takes a qualitative approach. Through a survey to 26 BPRS Adeco employees and semi-structured interviews with 4 employees, this study found three factors leading to an increase in the NPF ratio, namely weak bank’s financing risk management, changing economic conditions and regulations, and the conditions of customers who are vulnerable to socio-economic change. It found that the NPF can be gradually resolved by intensifying the communication to the delinquent customers followed by policies of restructuring the customers’ financing. It also found that the strategies to reduce NPF ratios include improving bank risk financing management, upgrading the quality of human resources in risk management, and providing business mentoring and coaching to the customers. It can be concluded that the strategies made by the BPRS ADECO succeeded in reducing the NPF rate from 15.62% in the June 2012 period to 3.60% in the December 2018 period. The finding implies that Islamic financial institutions, including BPRS, urgently need good finance risk management, particularly in monitoring the financed customers’ business and in mitigating external conditions of the economy and their changing related regulations in order to settle the problem of non-performing finance and to strengthen their finance risk management.
Keywords
References
Afif, Z. N., & Mawardi, I. (2014). Pengaruh Pembiayaan Murabahah terhadap Laba melalui Variabel Intervening Pembiayaan Bermasalah Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Jestt, Vol 1, No, 565–580.
Ascarya. (2013). Akad dan Produk Bank Syariah. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Astuti, R. Y. (2015). Pembiayaan Murâbahah yang Bermasalah di Baitul Mâl Wa Tamwîl (BMT) XYZ dalam Perspektif Manajemen Risiko. Islamic Economics Journal, Vol 1, No, 191–211.
Azhari, F. (2012). Mekanisme Dan Cara Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah. Jurnal Studi Ekonomi At - Taradhi, Volume 3, 85–92.
Bachri, B. S. (2010). Meyakinkan Validitas Data Melalui Triangulasi pada Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, Vol 10, No, 46–62.
Bank Indenesia. (2012). Statistik Perbankan Syariah Juni 2012.
Dewan Syariah Nasional. (2000). Fatwa Dewan Syari’ah Nasional NO: 07/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 Tentang Pembiayaan Mudharabah (Qiradh).
Hasanah, N., Sari, novi puspita, & Farida, L. (2015). Risiko Akad Murabahah serta Pengelolaan Risiko Akad Murabahah pada BMT-UGT Sidogiri Cabang Wongsorejo Kabupaten Banyuwangi. E-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, Volume 2 (, 1–5.
Hidayatullah, M. . (2014). Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah Di Bank Syariah. Jurnal Interest, Vol. 12, N, 67–79.
Ibrahim, A., & Rahmati, A. (2017). Analisis Solutif Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah di Bank Syariah: Kajian Pada Produk Murabahah di Bank Muamalat Indonesia Banda Aceh. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam Iqtishadia, Volume 10, 71–96.
Lailiyah, A. (2014). Urgensi Analisa 5C pada Pemberian Kredit Perbankan untuk Meminimalisir Resiko. Jurnal Yuridika, Volume 29, 217–232.
Maulidizen, A., & Taqiuddin, M. B. M. (2017). Penjadwalan Ulang Pembiayaan Mikro Murābaḥah i Bank Syariah Mandiri Cabang Dumai Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, Vol 17, No, 169–199.
Oka Aviani Savitri, et, A. (2014). Analisis Manajemen Risiko Kredit dalam Meminimalisir Kredit Bermasalah pada Kredit Usaha Rakyat (Studi pada Bank Jatim Cabang Mojokerto). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), Vol 12, No, 1–10.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2018). Statistik Perbankan Syariah Desember 2018.
Riyaldi, S. A. (2016). Tinjauan peranan analis pembiayaan dalam menunjang efektivitas penyaluran pembiayaan murabahah pada BPRS HIK parahyangan kantor cabang astana Anyar kota bandung. Prosidaing Keuangan Dan Perbankan Syariah ISSN: 2460-6561, volume 2, 231–238.
Shobirin. (2016). Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Murabahah Bermasalah Di Baitul Maal Wa Tamwil ( BMT ). Iqtishadia, 9(2), 398–420.
Subagyo, J. (2001). Metode Penelitian Dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Turmudi, M. (2016). Manajemen Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah pada Lembaga Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Studi Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam Li Falah, Volume I, 95–106.
Uly, Y. A. (2017). Data OJK Ungkap Kredit Bermasalah Bank Syariah 4,12%, Lebihi Konvensional 2,96%. Economy.Okezone.Com. Retrieved from https://economy.okezone.com/read/2017/12/15/320/1831077/data-ojk-ungkap-kredit-bermasalah-bank-syariah-4-12-lebihi-konvensional-2-96
Veithzal Rivai, et, A. (2007). Bank and Financial Institution Management. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
DOI: 10.15408/aiq.v11i1.11696
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.