Corruption in Higher Education; A Comparative Studies on Whistleblowing System between University of Stanford and Universitas Indonesia
Abstract
This study intends to show how a whistleblower system is used in higher education to deter academic dishonesty and fraud. The results showed that both Stanford University and the Universitas Indonesia recognized the importance of witness protection in the whistleblowing system, particularly to ensure the whistleblower’s safety. This was done using a comparative approach between Stanford University in the United States and the Universitas Indonesia. In addition to offering more traditional reporting channels, both colleges also offer application-based reporting media. In terms of reporting channels, Stanford University outperforms the Universitas Indonesia in terms of policies and governance. The findings of this study are expected to assist many universities in Indonesia in developing comparable programs and reporting procedures to rid higher education institutions of corruption.
Keywords
References
Books
Petersen, J., & Farrell, D. (1986). Whistleblowing: Ethical and Legal Issues in expressing dissent. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall-Hunt Publishing Company.
Journal article
Chapman, D. W., & Linder, S. (2014). Degrees of integrity: the threat of corruption in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 1-22.
Chaudhary, N. S., Gupta, K. P., & Phoolka, S. (2019). A study of whistle-blowing intentions of teacher working in higher education sector. International Journal of Law and Management, 1-30.
Dorasamy, N. (2012). Institutionalising a Whistle blowing Culture within Higher Education Institutions: Policy and Procedure Underpinning Good Governance at the Durban University of Technology. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 505-512.
Jubb, P. B. (1999). Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation. Journal of Business Ethic, 74-94.
Maulidi, A., & Ansel, J. (2021). Tackling practical issues in fraud control: a practice-based study. Journal of Financial Crime, 493-512.
Palumbo, R., & Manna, R. (2019). Uncovering the relationship between whistleblowing and organizational identity Some preliminary evidence from Italian publicly owned universities. International Journal on Public Sector Management, 94-112.
Pratiwi, E. T., Abdullah, R., & Abdullah, L. O. (2018). Whistleblowing Systems as an Initial Effort to Prevention and Detection of Fraud. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research , 22-26.
Pratolo, S., Sadjiman, V. P., & Sofyani, H. (2020). Determinants of Whistleblowing Intention of Employees in Universities: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Keuangan dan Akuntansi Indonesia, 92-101.
Rumyantseva, N. L. (2005). Taxonomy of Corruption in Higher Education. Peabody Journal of Education, 81-92.
Tatawi, M. L. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi dan Korban (Kajian UU Nomor 31 Tahun 2014). Lex et Societatis, 41-49.
Newspaper article
Puspitasari, M. A. (2020, June 9). ICW Temukan Lima Modus Korupsi di Perguruan Tinggi. Koran Tempo.
Sjafrina, A. G., & Anggraini, D. (2021). Tren Penindakan Korupsi Sektor Pendidikan: Pendidikan di Tengah Kepungan Korupsi. Jakarta: Indonesia Corruption Watch.
Website
The Employment Law Group. (n.d.). A Timeline of U.S. Whistleblowing. Retrieved from The Employment Law Group: https://www.employmentlawgroup.com/timeline-us-whistleblowing/
Egi. (2016, December 6). Korupsi di Perguruan Tinggi. Retrieved from Indonesia Corruption Watch: https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/korupsi-di-perguruan-tinggi
UI. (2018, 2022 13). Peraturan Rektor No 028 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pelaporan Dugaan Pelanggaran. Retrieved from Universitas Indonesia: http://eng.ui.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/Peraturan_Rektor_028_2018_Tentang_Sistem_Pelaporan_Dugaan_Pelanggaran.pdf
UI. (2022, 12 1). Sejarah Universitas Indonesia. Retrieved from Universitas Indonesia: https://www.ui.ac.id/tentang-ui/sejarah-ui/
Stanford, U. o. (2022, December 13). A History of Stanford. Retrieved from University of Stanford: https://www.stanford.edu/about/history/
Stanford, U. o. (2023, January 01). 1.1.1 University Code of Conduct. Retrieved from University of Stanford: https://adminguide.stanford.edu/chapters/guiding-policies-and-principles/university-code-conduct/university-code-conduct
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v12i1.38693 Abstract - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
