Koneksi Politik dan Aggresivitas Pajak: Fenomena di Indonesia
Abstract
This paper examines the effect of political connections and tax agressiveness in Indonesia. We used precentage of goverment ownership and firm’s directors who have informal ties with leading politicans or goverment for measuring political connections. The effective tax rates used for measurements of tax agressiveness. Data of this research is secondary data from annual report listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange with 148 listed companies in period 2013 – 2015. Method of analysis used panel data estimation prosedures. We find firms with political connections pay tax at significantly higher effective tax rates than the other firms.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 25(5): 574-595.
Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of economic literature, 36(2): 818-860.
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1): 41-61.
Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2010). The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 85(4): 1163-1189.
Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. The American economic review, 91(4): 1095-1102.
Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467-496.
Gomez, E. T. (2009). The rise and fall of capital: Corporate Malaysia in historical perspective. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 39(3), 345-381.
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2): 127-178.
Hanlon, M., & Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1): 126-141.
Harahap, S. S. (2011). Teori Akuntansi, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Kelima, PT. Raja Grafindo Perseda, Jakarta. Terjemahan. Edisi Ketujuh. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2): 323-329.
Kuncoro, M. (2003). Metode riset untuk bisnis & ekonomi: bagaimana meneliti & menulis tesis. Jakarta: Erlangga.
McIntyre, R. S., & Nguyen, T. C. (2000). Corporate income taxes in the 1990s: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy Washington, DC.
Sugiyono, M. P. P. (2007). Pendekatan Kuantitatif. Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.
Swingly, C., & Sukartha, I. (2015). Pengaruh Karakter Eksekutif, Komite Audit, Ukuran Perusahaan, Leverage dan Sales Growth Pada Tax Avoidance. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 10(1): 47-62.
Zhang, H., Li, W., & Jian, M. (2012). How does state ownership affect tax avoidance? Evidence from China: Working Paper At, Singapore Management University.
Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5: 119-149.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v10i1.5833 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Published by
Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Business,
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda no 95, Ciputat 15412, Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia
Phone:+62(21) 7493318, Fax.: +62 (21) 7496006. e-Mail: akuntabilitas@uinjkt.ac.idÂ
View My Stats
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA
Â