Constitutional Changes in the Perspective of Legal Philosophy
Abstract
This essay discusses constitutional change from the perspective of legal philosophy, focusing on philosophical, sociological, and legal aspects. Constitutional change is considered essential to maintain the relevance of a country's fundamental law. This essay reviews the debate between rigid and living constitutions, reflecting the tension between legal stability and flexibility. From the perspective of legal philosophy, constitutional change is analysed through the concepts of justice, utilitarianism, and social contract theory, which emphasise that change must create justice and reflect social consensus. Sociologically, this essay highlights factors such as demographic changes, developments in social values, and interest group pressures that drive constitutional change. From a legal perspective, this essay emphasises the importance of a legitimate amendment procedure to maintain legitimacy. Overall, this essay suggests that constitutional change should be carried out carefully to remain relevant to the dynamics of society without damaging the legal order.
References
Albert, R. (2019). Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions. Oxford University Press.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2020). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Balkin, J. M. (2011). Living Originalism. Harvard University Press.
Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford University Press.
Durkheim, E. (1893). The Division of Labor in Society. Free Press.
Elster, J. (2000). Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. Yale University Press.
Lutz, D. S. (2006). Principles of Constitutional Design. Cambridge University Press.
Mahfud MD, M. (2017). Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi. Rajawali Pers.
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Longman.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Rahardjo, S. (2016). Ilmu Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Rousseau, J. J. (1762). The Social Contract. Penguin Classics.
Scalia, A. (1997). A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton University Press.
Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford University Press.
Strauss, D. A. (2010). The Living Constitution. Oxford University Press.
Tierney, S. (2012). Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation. Oxford University Press.
Tilly, C. (2004). Social Movements, 1768–2004. Paradigm Publishers.
Widodo, J. (2021). Perubahan Konstitusi dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara. Sinar Grafika.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v7i2.46347
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.