MEASURING STUDENTS’ SELF DETERMINATION IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING: AN INSTRUMENT VALIDATION STUDY

Authors

  • Iryana Muhammad Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Al Jupri Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Kusnandi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Siti Fatimah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/ajme.v7i2.48714

Keywords:

instrument validation, mathematics learning, self-determination

Abstract

Abstract

Self-determination is an important psychological aspect to measure. Instruments to measure this aspect are still limited. This study aims to develop and validate a questionnaire to measure self-determination in junior high school students' mathematics learning. This instrument is designed to measure four indicators of self-determination: autonomy, competence, relatedness, and willingness to engage in active learning. The research used a quantitative, descriptive approach, with expert validation and empirical testing. Content validity was evaluated by five validators from the fields of psychology, language, and mathematics education using the Q-Cochran test. The results of the empirical testing were analyzed for validity using Pearson Product-Moment correlation, and reliability was measured using Cronbach's Alpha. The Q-Cochran test results showed consistency in the experts' assessments. Of the 40 statements, 32 were declared valid and 8 invalid, with a high level of reliability. Thus, the developed instrument was deemed valid and reliable for measuring students' autonomy, competence, relatedness, and willingness to actively learn in mathematics.

Abstrak

Determinasi diri merupakan salah satu aspek psikologis yang penting untuk diukur. Instrumen untuk mengukur aspek ini masih terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan dan memvalidasi instrumen angket determinasi diri siswa SMP dalam pembelajaran matematika. Instrumen ini dirancang untuk mengukur empat indikator determinasi diri, yaitu otonomi, kompetensi, keterkaitan, dan kemauan aktif belajar. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif melalui tahapan validasi ahli dan uji coba empiris. Validitas isi dievaluasi oleh lima validator dari bidang psikologi, bahasa, dan pendidikan matematika menggunakan uji Q-Cochran. Hasil uji coba empiris dianalisis validitasnya dengan korelasi Pearson Product Moment dan reliabilitas diukur menggunakan Cronbach’s Alpha. Hasil uji Q-Cochran menunjukkan adanya keseragaman penilaian para ahli. Dari 40 pernyataan, 32 dinyatakan valid dan 8 tidak valid, dengan tingkat reliabilitas tinggi. Dengan demikian, instrumen yang dikembangkan dinyatakan valid dan reliabel untuk mengukur otonomi, kompetensi, keterkaitan, dan kemauan aktif belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi revi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Asmarani, D. (2024). Pengembangan Instrumen Validasi Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Konteks Lokal Siswa SMP. ALGORITMA: Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1), 45–56. https://journal2.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/algoritma/article/view/42909

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of Self-Determination Theory. In Handbook of self-determination research. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197600047.001.0001

Ferdianto, F., & Hartinah, S. (2020). Analysis of the Difficulty of Students on Visualization Ability Mathematics Based on Learning Obstacles. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200402.053

Koo, M. (2025). Likert-Type Scale: A Review of Usage, Issues, and Best Practices. MDPI Data, 5(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5010018

Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. R. (2022). Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale: Education and Social Science Research, a Literature Review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.625

Mason, L. (2025). Cochran’s Q Test of Stimulus Overselectivity within the Autism Spectrum: A Demonstration of the Test’s Utility. Behaviour Research, 57(4), 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/BR.13092

Musyrifah, E., Nurasiah, D., & Hafiz, M. (2023). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Aljabar Siswa dengan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME). ALGORITMA: Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajme.v5i1.32581

Purnamasari, N. (2024). Analysis of students’ interest in learning mathematics. Powermath Edu, 3(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v3i3.2667

Rahman, F., Abdillah, hafizh Z., & Hidayah, N. (2020). Determinasi Diri Sebagai Prediktor School Well-Being Pada Siswa SMP. Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi, 05(01), 94–103.

Rahmawati, I., & Nugraha, E. (2021). Validasi Instrumen Sikap terhadap Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v5i2.8962

Ramezani, S. G., González, D. A., & Vega, C. (2025). Developing and Validating a Comprehensive Scale for Educational Contexts: A Multidimensional Instrument Validation Study. Education and Information Technologies, [online ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13587-5

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Safitri, I. (2024). Should Likert Data Be Transformed Using Summated Rating Scale? Evidence from Undergraduate Students. EduSci Journal, 3(2), 45–56.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi ke-3). Alfabeta.

Suprayogi, M. N., Al-Mahdaly, A., & Suryadi, D. (2022). The Role of Self-Determination in Mathematics Learning: Implications for Motivation and Engagement. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15432a

Utami, W., & Rosyidi, M. I. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 7(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v7i1.27890

Widjaja, Wanty, Dolk, Maarten, Fauzan, & Ahmad. (2015). The Role of Contexts and Teacher’s Questioning to Enhance Students’ Thinking. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(2).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

MEASURING STUDENTS’ SELF DETERMINATION IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING: AN INSTRUMENT VALIDATION STUDY. (2025). ALGORITMA: Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajme.v7i2.48714