KRITIK HARALD MOTZKI TERHADAP KLASIFIKASI MODEL PEMIKIRAN HADIS HERBERT BERG

Ahmad Ramzy Amiruddin, Muhammad Alfatih Suryadilaga

Abstract


There are four classifications of hadith scholars measured by how skeptical they are of the authenticity of the hadith, namely Early Western Scepticism, Reaction Against Scepticism, Middle Ground, and Renewed Scepticism. Of the four classifications, Berg divides them into two groups, namely those who are skeptical and non-skeptical. In response to this, Harald Motzki specifically criticized Berg's classification. The data source that used is based on the article "The Question of The Authenticity of Muslim Traditions Reconsidered: A Review Article" by Harald Motzki as the primary source and the supporting articles for this article as a secondary source. Through the descriptive-analytical method, the writer will describe Harald Motzki's criticism of Herbert Berg's classification and provide an analysis of it, so that readers can understand the point of Harald Motzki's criticism and the reasons behind the criticism. With that method, it was found that Harald Motzki thought that if Berg's classification, both logically and epistemologically, was useless. This is based on three main criticisms: First, the unclear definition of the classification. Second, the error in capturing the meaning of the hadith scholars. Third, there is a bias in the skeptical group, so that the explanation for the non-skeptical group is not balanced.


Keywords


Harald Motzki’s Criticism, Hadith Authenticity, Herbert Berg

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adib, Shohibul. “Pemikiran Harald Motzki Tentang Hadis (Telaah Metodologi Penelitian Harald Motzki Terhadap Kitab Al-Muṣannaf Karya Abdurrazāq As-San’ānī)”, dalam Al-Nidzam, Vol. 04, No. 01, 2017.

Al-Fauzi Harlis Yurnalis, Syukri. “Studi Orientalis Terhadap Islam, Dorongan Dan Tujuan”, dalam Jurnal Al-Aqidah, Vol. 11, Edisi 1, 2019.

Berg, Herbert. The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam: The Authenticity of Muslim Literature from the Formative Period. New York: Routledge. 2000.

Darussamin, Zikri. “Muhammadanische Studien (Eksistensi dan Implikasinya Dalam Studi Hadis), dalam Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, Vol. II, No. 2, 2003.

Edi Setyawan, Cahya. “Studi Hadis: Analisis Terhadap Pemikiran Schacht Dan A’zami”, dalam Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2016.

Hakim Wahid, Abdul. “Peta Perdebatan Akademik dalam Kajian Hadis”, dalam Refleksi, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2019.

Idri. Hadis dan Orientalis: Perspektif Ulama Hadis dan Orientalis tentang Hadis Nabi. Depok: Kencana. 2017.

Ihsanuddin, Nurul. “Metode Kritik Autentisitas Hadis Irene Schneider”, dalam Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2017

Irham, Masturi. “Sistematika Kodifikasi Hadis Nabi Dari Tinjauan Sejarah”, dalam Addin, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2013.

Junaidi, M. Rofiq. “Otentisitas Hadis Dalam Perspektif Harald Motzki”, dalam Al-A’raf, Vol. XII, No. 1, 2013.

Karim, Abdul “Pemikiran Orientalis Terhadap Kajian Tafsr Hadis”, dalam Addin, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2013.

_____, Abdul. “Pemikiran Orientalis Terhadap Kajian Tafsir Hadis”, dalam Addin, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2013.

Masrur, Ali. “Penerapan Metode Tradition-Historical Dalam Muṡannaf ‘Abd Al-Razzāq Al-San’ānī Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Persoalan Dating Hadis Dan Perkembangan Fikih Mekkah”, dalam Teologia, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2013

Motzki, Harald. “The Question of The Authenticty of Muslim Traditions Reconsidered: A Review Article”, dalam Method and Theory in the Study of Islamic Origins, Edited. Herbert Berg. Leiden: Brill. 2003.

Mufid, Abdul. “Dating Hadis Tentang Persaksian Melihat Hilal: Telaah atas Isnad Cum Matn Analysis Harald Motzki”, dalam Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2017.

Mukholik, Ayis. “Herbert Berg dan Verifikasi Otentisitas Hadis dalam Kitab Tafsir Jami’ al-Bayan fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an”, dalam Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2017.

Subakir, Ahmad. “Kritik atas Orientalisme dan Kecurigaan atas Kajian Keislaman di Dunia Barat”, dalam Religio: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2014.

Syarifuddin dan Moh. Zaiful Rasyid, “Persoalan Otentisitas Hadis Perspektif Ignaz Goldziher”, dalam Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2019.

Wansbrough, John. Quranic Studies: Its Genesis and Historical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1977.

Wazna, Ruhama. “Metode Kontemporer Menggali Otentisitas Hadis (Kajian Pemikiran Harald Motzki)”, dalam Ilmu Ushuluddin, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2018.

Wibowo Suwarno, Rahmadi. “Kesejarahan Hadis dalam Tinjauan Teori Common Link”, dalam Jurnal Living Hadis, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2018.

http://herbertberg.com/index.htm diakses pada 1 Juni 2020 pukul 10.43 WITA.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/ushuluna.v7i1.19177 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Neliti
www.journal-index.org

CrossrefScience and Technology Index (Sinta)Portal GarudaOneSearch

Google Scholar ROADCrossref

ResearchGateMorarefBaseWorldCat

Universität Bielefeld

    

View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.

Ushuluna, P-ISSN: 2460-9692, E-ISSN: 2721-754X