The Influence Of Policy Intervention, Personal Factor, And Physical Environmental Factor On Pro-Environmental Behavior

Agustin Yolandari, Jahja Umar

Abstract


Pro-environmental behavior is an act to protect and minimize the negative impacts of human activities on the environment. The purpose from this study is to determine whetherthere's influence from interventions policy, attitude towards pro-environmental behavior, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control (PBC), environmental knowledge (system knowledge, action related knowledge, and knowledge effectiveness), physical environmental factors (physical family environmental factor and physical society environmental factor), gender and age on pro- environmental behavior. The samples are 201 people who lives in Depok and South Tangerang, who has implemented an intervention policy called "Community-based Waste Management" and the areas of which the intervention policy have not been applied. The sampling technique used is a non-probability sampling and the data analysis used is Multiple Regression Analysis on the level of significance at0.05. The results showed that there is a significant influence on the whole independent variable towards pro-environmental behavior (R2=40.1%). Minor hypothesis test results shows that there are 8 variables that have a significant influence on pro-environmental behavior which are interventions policy, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control (PBC), system knowledge, physical family environmental factor, age and interaction between policy intervention and action related knowledge.

 

Perilaku pro-lingkungan adalah perilaku yang dilakukan untuk melindungi, memperbaiki serta meminimalisir dampak negatif dari aktivitas manusia terhadap lingkungan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada pengaruh dari kebijakan intervensi, sikap terhadap perilaku pro-lingkungan, norma subjektif, Perceived Behavior Control (PBC), pengetahuan lingkungan (system knowledge, action related knowledge, knowledge effectiveness), faktor lingkungan fisik (faktor lingkungan fisik keluarga, faktor lingkungan fisik masyarakat), jenis kelamin dan usia terhadap perilaku pro-lingkungan. Sampel pada penelitian ini adalah masyarakat yang bertempat tinggal di Depok dan Tangerang Selatan yang telah diterapkan kebijakan intervensi “Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Masyarakat” dan daerah yang belum diterapkan, yaitu sebanyak 201 orang. Teknik pengambilan sampelyang digunakan adalah non-probability sampling. Analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Multiple Regression Analysis pada taraf signifikansi 0.05. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ada pengaruh yang signifikan dari seluruh independent variable terhadap perilaku pro-lingkungan (R2=40,1%). Hasil uji hipotesis minor menunjukkan variabel yang memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap perilaku pro-lingkungan ialah kebijakan intervensi, norma subjektif, Perceived Behavior Control (PBC), system knowledge, faktor lingkungan fisik keluarga, usia dan interaksi antara kebijakan intervensi dan action related knowledge

 

DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v6i1.8147


Keywords


Perilaku Pro-Lingkungan, Kebijakan Intervensi, Sikap terhadap Perilaku Pro- Lingkungan, Norma Subjektif, Perceived Behavior Control (PBC), Pengetahuan Lingkungan, Faktor Lingkungan Fisik.

References


Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitude, Personality and Behavior Second Edition. New York: Open Unversity Press.

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions : a theory of planned behavior In J. Kuhl, Action Control, 11-39, Springer-Verlag BerlinHeideiberg.

American Psychological Association. (2015). APA Dictionary of Psychology Second Editon. Washington, DC. doi: 10.1037/14646-000

Badan Pengelola Lingkungan Hidup Daerah (BPLHD) Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta. (2014). Laporan Status Lingkungan Hidup Daerah Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Tahun 2014. Di unduh pada tanggal 21 Januari 2016 pukul 23:29 dari bplhd.jakarta.go.id/

Bamberg, S., & Moser, G. (2007). Twenty years after hines, hungerford, and tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho- social determinants of pro- environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002

Blok, V., Renate W., Oldrich S. & Ron K. (2014). Encouraging sustainability in the workplace: a survey on the pro- environmental behviour of unniversity employees. Journal of Cleaner Production. 1-12. doi.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.063

Corvalán, C., Kjellstrom, L., & Smith, K. (1999). Health, environment and sustainable development: identifying links and indicators to promote action. Epidemiology, 10 (5), 656-660.

Davis, J.L., Le, B., Coy, A.E., Rickert, J., Regan, B., & Ridgeway, K. (2015). Commitment to the environment: The role of subjective norms in college and community samples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 568-583. doi:10.1111/jasp.12320

Dunlap, Liere, Mertig & Jones. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), 425-442.

Fielding, K.S, McDonald, R. &Louis W.R. (2008). Theory of planned beahviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 318-

doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003

Frick, J., Kaiser, F., & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and individual differences, 37, 1597-1613. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015

Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. The annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541-579. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213- 115048.

Groot, J.D., & Steg, L. (2007). General belief and the theory of planned behavior: The role of environmental concerns in the TPB. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37 (8), 1817-1836.

Kaiser, F & Fuhrer, U. (2003). Ecological behavior’s dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied psychology, 52 (4), 598-613.

Kaiser, F.G. & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal- directed conservation beahvior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531-1544. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003

Kennedy, E.H., Beckley, T.M., McFarlane, B.L., Nadeau, S., (2009). Why we don´t walk the talk: Understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in Canada. Human Ecology Review. 16(2), 151–160.

Klockner, C.A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviora meta analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1028- 1038.doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05. 014

Kua, H.W., & Wong, S.E. (2012). Lessons for intergrated household energy conservation policies from an intervention study in Singapore. Energy Policy, 47, 49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.009

Larson, L.R., Stedman, R.C., Cooper, C.B., & Decker., D.J. (2015). Understanding the multi dimensional structure of Pro- Environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43,112-124, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.004

Midden, C.J.H., Kaiser, F.G. & McCalley, T. (2007). Technology’s four roles in understanding individuals concervations of natural resources. Journal of Social Issues, 63 (1),155-174

Molina, M .A.V., Fernandez-Sainz, A., Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2013). Environmental Knowledge and Other Variables Affecting Pro-Environmental Behavior: Comparison of University Students from Emerging and Advanced Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi: 10.1016/ j.jclepro.2013.05.015.

Niaura, A. (2013). Using the theory of planned behavior to investigate the determinants of environmental behavior among youth. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 1(63), 74-81.

Oskamp, S. (2000). Psychological Contributions to Achieving an Ecologically Sustainable Future for Humanity. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), 373-390.

Puspawati, C., & Besral. (2008). Pengelolaan sampah berbasis masyarakat di kampng rajawati Jakarta Selatan. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional, 3(1), 9-15.

Sanchez, M., Mosquera, N.L., & Lopez, F.L. (2015). Improving pro-environmental behaviours in Spain. The role of attitude and sociodemographic and political factors. Journal of Envionmental Policy and Planning, 1-21. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1046983 Song,

Q.,Wan,Z., & Li, J. (2012). Residents’ behaviors, attitudes, and willingness to pay for recycling ewaste in Macau. Journal of Environmental Management, 106, 8–16.

Susandi, Armi, Indriani Herlianti, & Mamad Tamamadin. (2008). Dampak Perubahan Iklim terhadapKetinggian Muka Laut di Wilayah Banjarmasin. Institut Teknologi Bandung. Di unduh tanggal 11 Februari 2016 dari http://armisusandi.com/articles/working _paper/8.pdf

Tanjung, Amrizal. (2008). Waste management program in Indonesia: Reduce, reuse, recycle program. Diunduh dari http://www2.gec.jp/gec/en/Activities/ecotown/FY2008/06amrizal.pdf

Turaga, R.M.R., Howarth, R.B. & Borsuk, M.E (2010). Pro-environmental behavior: Rational choice meets moral motivation. Issue: Ecological Economics Reviews, 211-224.

Utama, Abraham. (2015). BNPB: Kebakaran Hutan 2015 Seluas 32 Wilayah DKI Jakarta. di akses pada tanggal 21 Januari 2016 pukul 20.00 dari http://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20151030133801-20-88437/bnpb-kebakaranhutan-2015-seluas-32-wilayah-dki-jakarta/

Wiernik, B.M. & Ones. D.S. (2013), Age and environmental sustainability: A meta analysis. Journal of management psychology, Vol. 28 Iss 7/8 pp. 826-856. Doi. 10.1108/JMP-07-2013-0221.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Plagiarism Checker Powered by:

Gambar terkait

INDEX BY:

Image result for google scholar


Creative Commons License

Flag Counter

Web
Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter

 

JP3I licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.