Efek Sub-Sampel pada Deteksi Differential Item Functioning (DIF) dengan Metode Regresi Logistik
Hidalgo, M. D. & Lopez-Pina, J. A. (2004). Differential item func-tioning and effect size: A com-parison between logistic regres-sion and Mantel Haenszel procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 903-915.
Jordoin, M. G., & Gierl, M. J. (2001). Evaluating Type I error & power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection. Applied Measurement in Educa-tion, 14(4), 329-349.
Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical Significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psycho-logical Testing, 56, 746-759.
Lord, F. M. (1968). An analysis of the Verbal Scholastic Aptitude Test using Birnbaum‟s three-
parameter logistic model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 989-1020.
Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF): Logistic Regression Modeling as a Unitary Frame-work for Binary and Likert-Type (Ordinal) Item Scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
Roussos, L. A., & Stout, W. F. (1996b). Simulation studies of the effect of small sample size and standardized item parameters on SIBTEST and Mantel-Haenszel Type I errorperformance. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 215-230.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Rahmawati Rahmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.