Islamic Bank Listed in Financial Market: Risk, Governance, Earning, and Capital
Abstract
Islamic Bank is a bank that applies Islamic principles in running the business. Until 2015, there were 12 Islamic Bank in Indonesia; one of them already listed on the stock market. The purpose of this study was to analyze differences in the bank's soundness was assessed using a bank's risk profile, good corporate governance, income, and capital (RGEC) between listed Islamic Banks and the unlisted ones. Using the data period 2011-2015 used the independent t-test to test for differences. Statistical tests showed that there is no significant difference in credit risk as measured by NPF and Earning as measured by BOPO that represent cost efficiency between the two groups of companies. Listed Islamic banks have lower credit risk and greater efficiency than the unlisted ones
Keywords
References
Al Arif, M.N.R. (2015). Keterkaitan Kebijakan Pemisahan Terhadap Tingkat Efisiensi Pada Industri Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan. Vol. 19 (2): 295-304.
Anggraini, M. et.al. (2015). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Konvensional Dan Bank Syariah Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan RGEC (Studi pada PT. BRI, Tbk dan PT. BRI Syariah Periode 2011-2013). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB). Vol. 27 No. 1: 1-6.
Antonio, M.S. (2011). Bank Syariah Dari Teori ke Praktik.Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.
Astuti, H.D. (2015). Analisa Perbandingan Kinerja Bank Asing dan Bank Nasional dengan Rasio Keuangan. Jurnal Magister Manajemen. Vol.01, No.1: 19-29.
Bank Indonesia. (2011). PBI Nomor 13/1/PBI/2011 Tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum.
Bini, L. et.al. (2011). Signalling Theory and Voluntary Disclosure to The Financial Market (evidence from the profitability indicators published in the annual report), Paper presented at the 34th EAA Annual Congress, 20-22 April 2011.
Fitriana, N. et.al. (2015). Tingkat Kesehatan Bank BUMN Syariah dengan Bank Umum Konvensional: Metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Vol. 17 (2): 1-12.
Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Edisi 5. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hanif, M. (2011). Differences and Similarities in Islamic and Conventional Banking, International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 2 No. 2: 166-175.
Healy, P.M. & K.G. Palepu. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol. 31: 405–440.
Kuncoro, M. (2002). Manajemen Perbankan. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi UGM.
Lupa, W. et.al. (2016). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Perbankan Syariah dengan Perbankan Konvensional dengan Metode CAMEL. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi. Vol. 16 (1): 694-705.
Putri, I.D.A.D.E. & I.G.A.E. Damayanti. (2013). Analisis Perbedaan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Berdasarkan Risk profile,Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, &Capital pada perusahaan Perbankan Besar dan Kecil. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 5.2 (2013): 483-496.
Rivai, V. et.al. (2007). Bank and Financial Institution Management. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Rotinsulu, D.P. et.al. (2015). The Analyse of Risk-Based Bank Rating Method On Bank’s Profitability in State-Owned Banks. Jurnal EMBA. Vol.3 No.1: 95-106.
Sekaran, U. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Bisnis, 4th edition Buku 1. Jakarta: PT. Salemba Empat.
Simorangkir, C. (2003). Manajemen Keuangan. Jakarta: Badan Penerbitan FE Universitas Indonesia.
Sofyan, Y.P.P. & A.H. Anggono. (2015). The Effect of Risk Based Bank Rating Components towards Earnings on 19 Indonesian Commercial Banks in Period 2005-2014. Australian Journal of Accounting, Economics and Finance. Volume 1. Issue 1: 56-65.
DOI: 10.15408/aiq.v9i1.4011
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
