The Benefits of Backward Design in the English as a Foreign Language Context

Carlos Lenin Alvarez Llerena

Abstract


ABSTRACT

The Backward Design Model (BDM) is a curriculum approach in language teaching, which begins with the specification of learning outcomes that are the basis for developing instructional processes and input (Richards, 2013). This study aims to display a theoretical analysis of how the integration of the BDM has impacted English as a Foreign Language class. Thus, this study provides the results of reviewing research-based articles about how the integration of the BDM has benefited EFL teachers and students. These benefits are related to the main elements of the BDM, namely, designing learning to provide enduring understandings, assessing students’ performance based on acceptable evidence, and planning learning experiences and instructions based on desirable outcomes. The results indicated that the BDM indeed brought benefits to EFL teachers and students, revealing that this model's efficient application can help (a) teachers better understand the procedural knowledge of learning and (b) students improve their English language skills.

ABSTRAK

Backward Design Model merupakan pendekatan kurikulum dalam pengajaran bahasa yang diawali dengan spesifikasi hasil belajar yang menjadi dasar untuk pegembangan proses dan masukan pembelajaran (Richards, 2013). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menampilkan analisis teoritis tentang bagaimana integrasi Backward Design Model (BDM) berdampak pada kelas bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa asing. Penelitian ini merupakan hasil dari telaah artikel berbasis penelitian tentang bagaimana integrasi BDM bermanfaat bagi para guru dan siswa EFL. Manfaat ini berkaitan dengan elemen utama BDM yaitu merancang pembelajaran untuk pemahaman yang bertahan lama, penilaian kinerja siswa berdasarkan bukti yang dapat diterima, dan merencanakan pengalaman dan instruksi pembelajaran berdasarkan hasil yang diinginkan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa BDM memang membawa manfaat bagi para guru dan siswa. Hasil penelitian juga mengungkapkan bahwa penerapan model yang efisien ini membantu para guru untuk memiliki pemahaman yang lebih baik tentang pengetahuan prosedural pembelajaran dan juga membantu siswa untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berbahasa Inggris mereka.


Keywords


Backward Design; EFL; English learning, Curriculum design

References


Brown, J. L. (2004). Making the most of understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Design.

Childre, A., Sands, J. R., & Pope, S. T. (2009). Backward design: Targeting depth of understanding for all learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(5), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990904100501

Clayton, S. (2011). Understanding by Design: Designing learning, assessment, and teaching for understanding. ASCD Singapore, 16, 63-66. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1060.77&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Daugherty, K. K. (2006). Backward course design: making the end the beginning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(6), 135. http://10.5688/aj7006135

Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st-century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31-50. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Susan_Drake2/publication/324250557_Integrated_Curriculum_as_an_Effective_Way_to_Teach_21st_Century_Capabilities/links/5afc7e60a6fdcc3a5a273005/Integrated-Curriculum-as-an-Effective-Way-to-Teach-21st-Century-Capabilities.pdf

Eddy, J. (2017). Unpacking the Standards for Transfer: Intercultural Competence by Design. NECTFL Review, 79, 53-72. https://www.nectfl.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/NECTFL-SPECIAL-ISSUE.pdf#page=55

Fox, B. E., & Doherty, J.J. (2012). Design to learn, learn to design: Using backward design for information literacy instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 5 (2), 144-155. https://doi.org/ 10.15760/comminfolit.2012.5.2.109

Hodaeian, M., & Biria, R. (2015). The effect of backward design on intermediate EFL learners' L2 reading comprehension: Focusing on learners' attitudes. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(7), 80-93. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/162

Hosseini, H., Chalak, A., & Biria, R. (2019). Impact of Backward Design on Improving Iranian Advanced Learners' Writing Ability: Teachers' Practices and Beliefs. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 33-50. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1211038

Jozwik, S., Lin, M., & Cuenca-Carlino, Y. (2017). Using Backward Design to develop service-learning projects in teacher preparation. New Waves-Educational Research and Development Journal, 20(2), 35-49. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1211391.pdf

Korotchenko, T. V., Matveenko, I. A., Strelnikova, A. B., & Phillips, C. (2015). Backward design method in foreign language curriculum development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 215, 213-217. http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/33666

Marzano, R. J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2015). Research using qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods and choices based on the research. Perfusion, 30(7), 537-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267659114559116

McTighe, J., & Thomas, R. S. (2003). Backward design for forward action. Educational leadership, 60(5), 52-55. http://edml260.pbworks.com/f/Backward+Design+for+Forward+Action+.pdf

Mohamed Abd El Ghany, O., Salem Mahmoud Zaza, M., Mohamed Amin, M. & El Shazly Yousif, A. (2019). Using Performance Assessment Tasks for Developing EFL Listening Comprehension Skills among Preparatory Stage Pupils, Journal of College Education, 30(118), 1-20. ‎https://doi.org/ 10.12816/JFEB.2019.61557

Sideeg, A. (2016). Bloom's Taxonomy, Backward Design, and Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development in Crafting Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 158-186. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9252

Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293

Wach, E., & Ward, R. (2013). Learning about qualitative document analysis. IDS Practice Paper in Breif. 13(1), 1-10. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/2989

Whitehouse, M. (2014). Using a backward design approach to embed assessment in teaching. School Science Review, 95(352), 99-104. http://www.physics.smu.edu/~sdalley/quarknet/2015/2015QuarkNet_files/Physics%20Curriculum%20Constructs/ASE%20Backward%20Design.pdf

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v19n1.11490

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). What is backward design. Understanding by design, 1, 7-19. Retrieved from: https://valenciacollege.edu/faculty/development/courses-resources/documents/WhatisBackwardDesignWigginsMctighe.pdf

Yurtseven, N., & Altun, S. (2017). Understanding by design (UbD) in EFL teaching: Teachers' professional development and students' achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.2.0226

Yurtseven, N., & Altun, S. (2015). Understanding by design (UbD) in EFL teaching: The investigation of students' foreign language learning motivation and views. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(3), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i3.1204


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/ijee.v7i2.17785

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.