Impact of Changes to Subsidised Electricity Tariffs on The Welfare Of Households

Andri Yudhi Supriadi, Mohamad Ikhsan, Benedictus Raksaka Mahi, Montty Girianna

Abstract


The subsidized electricity tariff enjoyed by households in Indonesia with an installed capacity of 450 VA and 900 VA has not changed since mid-2003. This subsidy creates an increasing economic burden on the state budget. This study examines the impact of a subsidized electricity tariff increase on subsidized household welfare and the redistribution of subsidy allocation. The analysis divided into two stages: first, estimating household electricity demand for each household group when prices fixed; and second, measuring changes in welfare, inefficiency and the redistribution of subsidy allocations. This empirical study shows that an increase in tariffs causes the welfare of subsidized households to decline. It also demonstrates inefficiency in the allocation of subsidies to the top 20% group with an installed capacity of 450 VA. Besides, subsidized households in the lowest 40% group, which initially only enjoyed 26.26% increased to 34.16% after the tariff increase. On the other hand, the top 20% group, which initially enjoyed the electricity subsidy allocation of 28.74%, decreased to 20.40% after the tariff increase.

JEL Classification: D1, D3, D6, I3


Keywords


household electricity demand; fixed price; subsidy; welfare; Subsidised Electricity Tariff

References


Alberini, A., & Filippini, M. (2011). Response of Residential Electricity Demand to Price: The Effect of Measurement Error. Energy Economics, 33(5), 889-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.03.009.

Araghi, M. K., & Barkhordari, S. (2012). An Evaluation of the Welfare Effects of Reducing Energy Subsidies in Iran. Energy Policy, 47, 398-404.

Bernstein, M. A., & Griffin, J. (2006). Regional Differences in the Price-Elasticity of Demand for Energy. Rand Corporation: Santa Monica, California.

Diop, N. (2014). Why is Reducing Energy Subsidies a Prudent, Fair, and Transformative Policy for Indonesia? Jakarta: World Bank.

Filippini, M. (1999). Swiss Residential Demand for Electricity. Applied Economics Letters, 6(8), 533-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048599352880.

Halicioglu, F. (2007). Residential Electricity Demand Dynamics in Turkey. Energy Economics, 29(2), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.11.007.

Ikhsan, M., & Purbasari, D. (2012). Determination of Electricity Tariffs in Indonesia: Integrating Efficiency and Poverty Reduction Goals. In The Plenary Session of The Indonesian Economist Association, July 17 2008, In Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara.

Kamerschen, D. R., & Porter, D. V. (2004). The Demand For Residential, Industrial and Total Electricity, 1973-1998. Energy Economics, 26(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-99883(03)00033-1.

Kanagawa, M., & Nakata, T. (2006). Assessment of Access to Electricity and the Socio-Economic Impacts in Rural Areas of Developing Country. Energy Policy, 36(6), 2016-2029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.041.

Leser, C. E. V. (1963). Form of Engel Function. Econometrica, 31(4), 694-703.

Makmun., & Abdurrahman. (2003). Dampak Kenaikan Tarif Dasar Listrik Terhadap Konsumsi Listrik dan Pendapatan Masyarakat (Impact of Electricity Tariff Increase on Electricity Consumption and Community Income). Jurnal Keuangan Dan Moneter, 6(2), 63-83

Malik, A. S., & Al-Zubaedi, S. (2006). Electricity Tariffs Based on Long Run Marginal Costs for Central Grid System of Oman. Energy, 31(12), 1703-1714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.11.010.

Nakajima, T., & Hamori, S. (2010). Change in Consumer Sensitivity to Electricity Prices in Response to Retail Deregulation: a Panel Empirical Analysis of the Residential Demand for Electricity in The United States. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2470-2476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.041.

Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2005). The Residential Demand for Electricity in Australia: an Application of The Bound Testing Approach to Cointegration. Energy Policy, 33(4), 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.011.

Okajima, S., & Okajima, H. (2013). Estimation Of Japanese Price Elasticities Of Residential Electricity Demand. Energy Economics, 40, 433-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.eneco.2013.07.026.

Renner, S., Lay, J., Schleicher, M., & Nuryartono, N. (2015). Poverty and Distributional Impacts of Energy Subsidy Reform in Indonesia. The Green Growth Knowledge Platform (Ggkp’s) Third Conference.

Zarezadeh, M., Azadeh, M., & Ghaderi, S. (2010). Analyzing Effects of Electricity Subsidy on Social Welfare in Iran by Integrated System Approach and Artifical Neural Network. Ieee International Conference On Social Computing, 630-635.

Zhou, S., & Teng, F. (2015). Estimation Of Urban Residential Electricity Demand in China Using Household Survey Data. Energy Policy, 61, 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.enpol.2013.06.092

Ziramba, E. (2008). The Demand for Residential Electricity in South Africa. Energy Policy, 36(9), 3460-3466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.05.026.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/etk.v18i2.12041

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 ETIKONOMI