REDUPLIKASI ADVERBIA SEBAGAI PROSEDE MORFOLOGIS PALING DOMINAN DALAM BAHASA INDONESIA: PERSPEKTIF PRAGMATIK SISTEMIK

R. Kunjana Rahardi

Abstract


Abstract: Research on the reduplication of open and closed word classes in Indonesian language morphology in a systemic pragmatic perspective was carried out in order to respond to this reality. The research problem is formulated as follows, (1) What are the manifestations of open word class reduplication in Indonesian morphological procedures from a systemic pragmatic perspective; (b) What is the most dominant class of word reduplication in Indonesian morphological procedures? The data of this study were collected by listening and competent methods. The listening method used is applied by note taking and recording techniques. As for the proficient methods used, the proficiency techniques are proficient and the techniques of proficiency are not upfront. The proficient methods and techniques are supplemented by note taking and recording techniques. The data that has been presented well, has been classified and properly typified, then analyzed using the distribution analysis method and the method of matching analysis. The conclusions of this study are: (1) Reduplication of adverb word classes occurs with a very dominant use of informal Indonesian in electronic mass media such as those contained in television. (2) Reduplication both in the word classes of adverbs, verbs, adjectives, nouns, and numerals found in this study partly changes the word class and meaning, changes the word class but does not change the meaning. (3) The systemic pragmatic perspective can be used to interpret the reduplication more precisely because in this perspective the internal aspects of the language as well as the external aspects of the language are equally considered.

Abstrak: Penelitian reduplikasi kelas kata terbuka dan tertutup dalam prosede morfologi bahasa Indonesia dalam perspektif pragmatik sistemik ini dilakukan dalam rangka merespons kenyataan ini. Masalah penelitian ini dirumuskan sebagai berikut, (1) Apa sajakah manifestasi reduplikasi kelas kata terbuka dalam prosede morfologis bahasa Indonesia ditinjau dari perspektif pragmatik sistemik; (b) Reduplikasi kelas kata apakah yang paling dominan terjadi dalam prosede morfologis bahasa Indonesia? Data penelitian ini dikumpulkan dengan metode simak dan metode cakap. Metode simak yang digunakan diterapkan dengan teknik catat dan teknik rekam. Adapun metode cakap yang digunakan adalah teknik cakap semuka dan teknik cakap yang tidak semuka. Metode dan teknik cakap itu dilengkapi dengan teknik catat dan teknik rekam. Data yang telah tersaji dengan baik, telah diklasifikasi dan ditipifikasi dengan baik, selanjutnya dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode analisis distribusional dan metode analisis padan. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah, (1) Reduplikasi kelas kata adverbia terjadi dengan sangat dominan dalam pemakaian bahasa Indonesia informal di media massa elektronik seperti yang terdapat dalam televisi. (2) Reduplikasi baik dalam kelas kata adverbia, verba, adjektiva, nomina, maupun numeralia yang ditemukan dalam penelitian ini sebagian mengubah kelas kata dan makna, mengubah kelas kata tetapi tidak mengubah makna. (3) Perspektif pragmatik sistemik dapat digunakan untuk memaknai reduplikasi tersebut secara lebih tepat karena dalam perspektif ini aspek internal kebahasaan maupun aspek eksternal kebahasaan sama-sama dipertimbangkan.

 


Keywords


reduplication of adverb; morphological procede; systemic pragmatics; Reduplikasi adverbia; prosede morfologis; pragmatik sistemik

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allan, Keith. “The Pragmatics of Connotation.” Journal of Pragmatics, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.004.

Amuzu, E. K. “Sociopragmatics of Conversational Codeswitching in Ghana.” Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 2012.

Anshari, Asep Fajar. “Interferensi Leksiko-Gramatikal Dari Bahasa Indonesia Terhadap Bahasa Sunda Dalam Lirik Lagu Pop Sunda.” LOKABASA, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17509/jlb.v4i1.3097.

Bandura, Albert. “Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context.” Applied Psychology, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00092.

Bergen, Leon, and Daniel J. Grodner. “Speaker Knowledge Influences the Comprehension of Pragmatic Inferences.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027850.

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper. “Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies.” In The Pragmatics Reader, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007022.

Blutner, Reinhard. “Lexical Pragmatics.” Journal of Semantics, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/15.2.115.

Clancy, Brian, and Anne O’Keeffe. “Pragmatics.” In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/9781139764377.014.

Fallis, A.G. “An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics.” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.

Goddard, Cliff. “Ethnosyntax, Ethnopragmatics, Sign-Functions, and Culture.” In Ethnosyntax: Explorations in Grammar and Culture, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199266500.003.0003.

Goddard, Cliff. “The Ethnopragmatics and Semantics of ‘Active Metaphors.’” Journal of Pragmatics, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.011.

Gretsch, Cécile. “Pragmatics and Integrational Linguistics.” Language and Communication, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.02.010.

Halliday, M.I.M, and M.A.K Matthiessen. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269.

JACOB L. MEY. Concise Encyclopedia of Languages of the World. Elsevier Ltd, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2009.01.006.

Jaszczolt, Kasia M. “Pragmatics and Philosophy: In Search of a Paradigm.” Intercultural Pragmatics, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0002.

Johnson, Ellen. “Qualitative Methods in Sociolinguistics.” Journal of English Linguistics, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1177/00754240122005503.

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. “Lexicography in Indonesia.” RELC Journal, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368827901000205.

Lascarides, Alex, and Ann Copestake. “Pragmatics and Word Meaning.” Journal of Linguistics, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226798007087.

Mahsun, MS. “Metode Penelitian Bahasa.” Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1991.

Norrick, Neal R. “Interjections as Pragmatic Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005.

Pandean, Mariam L.M. “Kalimat Tanya Dalam Bahasa Indonesia.” Kajian Linguistik 5, no. 3 (2018): 235–42. https://doi.org/10.35796/kaling.5.3.2018.25030.

Peppé, Sue, Joanne McCann, Fiona Gibbon, Anne O’Hare, and Marion Rutherford. “Assessing Prosodic and Pragmatic Ability in Children with High-Functioning Autism.” Journal of Pragmatics, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.07.004.

Rahardi, Kunjana. “Personal and Communal Assumptions to Determine Pragmatic Meanings of Phatic Functions.” Lingua Cultura 10, no. 2 (2016): 95. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v10i2.897.

Rahardi, R. Kunjana. Bahasa Indonesia Untuk Perguruan Tinggi. 1st ed. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2009.

Rahardi, R. Kunjana. “Linguistic Impoliteness in The Sociopragmatic Perspective.” Jurnal Humaniora, 2017. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v29i3.24954.

Rahardi, R. Kunjana. “Menemukan Hakikat Konteks Pragmatik.” Prosiding Seminar PRASASTI, 2015. https://doi.org/10.20961/PRAS.V0I0.63.G47.

Rahardi, R. Kunjana. Penyuntingan Bahasa Indonesia Untuk Karang-Mengarang. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2010.

Rampton, Ben. “Linguistic Ethnography , Interactional Sociolinguistics and the Study of Identities.” In Applied Linguistics Methods: A Reader. Systemic Functional Linguistics, Critical Discourse Analysis and Ethnography, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2307/2199522.

Reeder, Patricia A., Elissa L. Newport, and Richard N. Aslin. “From Shared Contexts to Syntactic Categories: The Role of Distributional Information in Learning Linguistic Form-Classes.” Cognitive Psychology, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.09.001.

Salehuddin, Khazriyati, Heather Winskel, and Marlyna Maros. “The Pragmatic Functions of Numeral Classifiers in Modern Malay Written Corpus.” GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 11, no. 2 (2011): 137–53.

Santoso, Anang. “Jejak Halliday Dalam Linguistik Kritis Dan Analisis Wacana Kritis.” Bahasa Dan Seni, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1067-y.

Science, Locke, Publishing Company, Michael H Long, Suresh Canagarajah, Richard A Peterson, Joane Nagel, Shun Lu, et al. “An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method.” Journal of Pragmatics, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(88)90022-X.

Sudaryanto. Metode Dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press, 2015.

Sudaryanto. Metode Dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press, 2016.

Tabor, Whitney, Bruno Galantucci, and Daniel Richardson. “Effects of Merely Local Syntactic Coherence on Sentence Processing.” Journal of Memory and Language, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.001.

Wang, Shih Ping. “Corpus-Based Approaches and Discourse Analysis in Relation to Reduplication and Repetition.” Journal of Pragmatics, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.08.002.

Williams, Lawrence. “Pragmatics of Second Language Computer-Mediated Communication.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0942.

Yus, Francisco. Cyberpragmatics, Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Edited by Anita Fetzer. 1st ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company, 2011.

Yus, Francisco. “Humor and the Search for Relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00179-0.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/dialektika.v7i2.15216 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Dialektika : Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, P-ISSN : 2407-506X E-ISSN : 2502-5201

Indexing by:

    

more...