The Ideological Study of Judicials From The Formal Centralistis to The Legal Pluralism (Analysis of the Meaning of Judge on Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 Year 2009 on Judicial Power)

Rina Yulianti, Mufarrijul Ikhwan

Abstract


Article 5 (1) of Law Number 48 Year 2009 concerning Judicial Power becomes ineffective if acentralistic ideology still working  in view of the judge. The type of study used in this researchwas a non-doctrinal legal studies (sociolegal research). Research conducted in the DistrictCourt and Religious Court in Madura based on the judges perception by meaning of article 5paragraph (1) law 48/2009 and justices consideration to verdict making process. The resultsshowing the judges majority interpret the Article 5, paragraph 1 Law 28/2009 to legaldiscovery (rechtsvinding) as an efforts if a legal vacuum, otherwise the judges did notinterpret used living law when there are legal gaps. Thus showing domination of the state lawover the law that lives in society.

 

DOI: 10.15408/jch.v5i2.4190


Keywords


Ideologi, Hakim; Sentralistik; Pluralisme

Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Plagiarism Checker Powered by:

Gambar terkait

Indexed by :

EBSCO Sherpa/romeoDOAJ /public/site/images/mhelmi/googlescholarlogo_300 /public/site/images/mhelmi/logogaruda-besar_284_01 /public/site/images/erwin/as_370 /public/site/images/mhelmi/s4_103


Creative Commons License
JURNAL CITA HUKUM licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web
Analytics
View My Stats

Free counters!